Hospital Administration Attempts to Cut Costs and Increase Quality at Expense of Physicians

A nonprofit hospital care system in Oregon with 450 beds has been in an acrimonious negotiation with its staff hospitalists for the past 2 years. The mounting economic pressures on this small, community oriented institution have had the expected consequences of hiring new administrators to implement the latest trends to rein in the budget and effect efficiencies of healthcare delivery-- as if that has been so successful in the rest of the country. The battle has really centered over the physicians losing control of their work time allocation, individual decision-making for diagnostic and treatment plans, as well as bristling at bonuses based on the administration’s definition of quality.

The parry and thrust shows both sides being intransigent as the physicians avoid confronting the economic exigencies facing the survival of the institution and the administrators demanding they have “skin in the game” for reaching cost saving metrics, as though putting your name on the chart and taking professional and legal responsibility for patient outcomes is not skin enough. Now the hospitalists want to unionize, thinking that solidarity will preclude mass firing and may allow leveraging their negotiating power by allying with hospitalists at other institutions.

When I was still clinically active, I never could understand the value added of the rapidly breeding throng of administrative FTE’s that complicated, not expedited, patient care. But in the Oregon case I was taken aback by one stalled issue. These hospitalists work 7 days on then 7 days off. They are base paid $223,000/year for 173 8-12 hour shifts per year. They are balking at an offer of $260,000 for 182 similar shifts per year, as it may infringe upon sick leave and vacation time. There are many practitioners working full time whose hourly rate is far less than that.

The United States is not the only country with a potential union-led labor dispute. Last week, hospital doctors in England began a 24-hour strike that disrupted treatment for thousands of patients in the National Health Service. Although a beloved institution of ole Albion, the health service has had chronic financial strains that have recently been exacerbated by an aging population and the current political mandate for stiff budget cuts. The British Medical Association represents 37,000 of these “registrars” in training (our residents), who are disputing a new contract that would increase base pay, but pare back weekend compensation. The government says more staffing is needed to create true 24/7 coverage. Ninety-eight percent of doctors voted to strike because they said the proposal would create excessive working hours that would negatively impact patient safety.

Officially, the house staff works a 48-hour week, but that is calculated over 26 weeks. The new schedule may have them work longer stretches than at present, particularly over weekends. I reiterate, the house staff (doctors in training), have a 48-hour work week, as opposed to our mandatory 80-hour limit that has impacted most surgical programs, if not non-surgical specialties.

I do not subscribe to the myth and nostalgia about the “good old days” when I trained when men were men and giants walked the wards. Postgraduate education has changed and is meeting new challenges, the autocratic system of yore swept under the table. However, I think both stories speak to a need that certain physicians, either in training or in practice, have to answer to a higher standard of professional dedication when negotiating work contracts. Patient safety is sacrosanct, therefore, do not wave it bogusly as a bloodied shirt of labor’s extortion by capitalistic greed.

By Norman Silverman, MD, with Ryan McKennon, DO and Ren Carlton

 

Why Would a Doctor Abandon a Steady Paycheck to Become an Entrepreneur?

As physicians, we are expected to be compliant with rules, restrictions, and regulations. We are expected to be risk averse. We are expected to be “providers,” but not necessarily innovators or leaders. As the healthcare system becomes increasingly consolidated into large overcrowded clinics, we are required to perform to the standards set by bureaucrats and clinic managers. These rules are often at odds with the best interests of patients and with our sanity.

The Alienation Of America’s Best Doctors

The best and the brightest simply don’t want to become doctors anymore. Physicians are burning out. They are leaving the profession. They are going bankrupt. They are selling their private practices to big hospitals. They are retiring early. We are facing a growing doctor shortage.

Better to Live and Die in the U.S.A.

The United States healthcare system is often berated for how it treats patients near the end of life. They are purportedly attached to tubes and machines and subjected to unnecessary invasive procedures that cause inordinate pain with no potential benefit, there is underutilization of more compassionate hospice services. This “travesty” is expensive, as the care of dying seniors consumes over 25% of Medicare expenditures. We hear this story so often; it is almost taken as gospel-- but is it actually true? Is it more expensive and invasive to die in America than in other developed countries?

Gun Ownership and Doctors?

According to the Pew Research Center, there are approximately 32,000 gun-related deaths annually in the United States; 19,000 are suicide, 11,000 are homicide, and the rest are accidents, police shootings or of unknown causation. Moreover, there are more than 78,000 nonfatal gun wounds each year. Given the disproportionate number of victims that are less than 40 years of age, the morbidity and mortality of gun violence is significant. Physicians are involved with many types of public health issues, but few are as controversial or divisive as gun safety. Is it really an issue that falls within the medical domain?

O Tempora, O Mores: Affordable Care Act - Big Dream or Big Let Down?

I confess I was a strong proponent of the Affordable Care Act. My reasoning was subtler than the hallowed pantheons of its staunch supporters and the apocalyptic predictions of its detractors. Forty years after graduating medical school I concluded, after many stutter steps, the American healthcare delivery system was economically unsustainable and the citizenry was neither living longer, nor better, despite medical expenditures that dwarf any other developed nation. My career also allowed me to personally interact with cardiac surgeons from all continents and see that their clinical results and research efforts were laudatory by any standards.

High Depression Rates in Resident Physicians — Fact or Fiction?

The December 8, 2015 issue of JAMA had a startling key clinical point; the prevalence of depression or depressive symptoms among resident physicians in training was 28.8%. The data was generated by meta-analysis of 31 cross-sectional and 23 longitudinal studies published in peer-reviewed journals involving 17,560 trainees. Two-thirds of the trainees were in North America, but the others were from Asia, Europe, South America, and one from Africa. Sensitivity-analysis confirmed that no individual study affected overall prevalence by more than 1% and that the incidence of depression was not influenced by study design, continent of origin, surgical vs nonsurgical program nor level of residency year.

Can a Robot Outperform Your Surgeon?

In the current competitive environment, healthcare providers often attempt to separate themselves from their competition by marketing themselves as using the newest technologies for their procedures. This is an age defined by finding the next best thing and the American public responds to this strategy. My personal experience has been in cardiac surgery, but the principles are equally applicable to other specialties, particularly tertiary referral practices.

Michigan Physicians Society Supports Inner-City Education

Yesterday afternoon I had the privilege of helping to honor the graduating class of 2016 at Experiencia Preparatory Academy. They have 3 graduates this year that have overcome a special set of challenges, including moving from Mexico to the United States and having English as a second language.

Affordable Care Act: Affordable for whom?

Entering its third annual open enrollment period, Obamacare is the subject of cacophonous political acrimony, again, championed by its supporters and vilified by its opponents. Each side presents its own “metrics” of success or failure

Big Pharma Using Mail-Order Pharmacies to Maintain High Prices

The United States has the dubious honor of paying the highest prescription drug costs in the world. Many healthcare economists attribute this to relatively lax cost regulation compared to other wealthy countries; however, a decade of insurers paying only for generic drugs when available and limiting drug choice in specific formularies has had little modulating effect.
Page: 123 - All